Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 9 – If Russia is
to respond to the new challenges it faces, Moscow must scrap the existing
military districts (MDs) introduced by former defense minister Anatoly Serdyukov
and create new MDs that correspond to
the new challenges the country faces, according to Yuri Selivanov, a military
expert with close ties to the General Staff.
At present and as a result of
Serdyukov’s innovations, they are not well-fitted for that, he says, and
nowhere is the situation worse than in the Southern MD. Its headquarters is
only a 100 kilometers from Ukraine, but it extends to the Caspian and so
remains responsible for organizing military exercises there as well (regnum.ru/news/polit/1882937.html).
Of course, it has a large staff and
can handle many tasks simultaneously, but “there is only one commander and the
military hierarchy does not divide easily into parts.” Moreover, the Southern MD
is not the only one adjoining Ukraine and having divided tasks. So too is the
Western MD, even though its primary task is dealing with NATO.
Under the current arrangements, he
says, “there are two military districts on the border Russia has with Ukraine which
have such an enormous sphere of responsibilities that the Ukrainian problem
risks simply being lost,” not to speak of the problems certain to arise as a
result of the difficulties of having the two cooperate.
These problems arise, Selivanov
continues, as a result of the division of the country into only four MDs, a
decision that was taken by Serdyukov “not so much out of military-political
considerations in which he was clearly not strong so much as from economic and
possibly even commercial motives.”
But the problems with the Seryudkov
arrangement of only four military districts are not limited to this or to
Ukraine, he argues. Having a large number of MDs makes it far more difficult
for an enemy to decapitate the armed forces; having a small number makes sense
only if there is no immediate threat.
Moreover, as the military is
modernized under President Vladimir Putin’s direction, its tasks become more
complicated and diverse, arguing for greater subdivisions rather than fewer as
Serdyukov imposed and is currently the case. The current four simply face an “unbearable
burden” given the new arms buildup.
And finally, there is the political
aspect of the situation, Selivanov says.
The central government has always before drawn the borders of the MDs in
order to protect the territorial integrity of the country from any challenge.
But the current arrangement does not work nearly as well.
“Both in tsarist Russia and in the
Soviet Union, the political leadership” prevented the appearance of any
separatist movements by so organizing military structures that they would be
able to work against them effectively. But that is not the case now, nor is it
even the case that the MD borders may not in fact encourage separatists to
challenge Moscow.
“For example,” Selivanov says, “the
very same Eastern MD controls at present practically all of Siberia and the Far
East, including the nuclear rocket-equipped Pacific Fleet. Despite that, its
staff is in Yekaterinburg, a city known not only for its glorious military and
labor traditions but also for the periodic appearance in the heads of some”
there of “the foolish ideas of creating some kind of ‘Siberian Republic.’”
In the pre-Serdyukov period, there
were three MDs beyond the Urals as well as an independent Pacific Fleet, an
arrangement that Selivanov suggests undercut any such thinking.
As far
as the Ukraine “direction” is concerned, the military commentator says, one
possible way forward would be to create a South-West Strategic Command “which
would take on itself the functions of regional coordinator for all efforts of
the military structures connected with the Ukrainian issue.”
The
Southern MD should focus on the Caspian area and have its headquarters not in
Rostov as now but rather somewhere in the Middle Volga, “where at one time
existed the Volga MD.” And the Western
MD, which has already been freed from responsibilities over the Arctic should
focus on its traditional task of “restraining our ‘cursed friends’ from NATO.”
No comments:
Post a Comment