Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 24 – Those who
hope for a resolution of what Moscow has managed to label “the Ukrainian
crisis” need to recognize that Vladimir Putin has no interest in the Donbas or
even some mythical “Novorossiya.” He wants to destroy the independence of
Ukraine and is using both military and diplomatic means for the achievement of
that goal.
That is the judgment of some of the
best analysts in Moscow, two of whom, Igor Eidman and Pavel Felgengauer, have
offered parallel arguments and conclusions in their latest commentaries (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=54C24C01AB7EC and obozrevatel.com/politics/96175-tsel-kremlya-ne-donbass-a-kiev-rossijskij-voennyij-ekspert.htm).
According
to Eidman, Putin’s tactics in Ukraine remain the same: “the imitation of a step
back” in order to allow “two steps forward along the path of expansion.” At
present in fact, he points out, “Russia is introducing new military units in
the Donbas and increasing attacks on Ukrainian forces.”
In
a related move, “the Russian side is imitating a readiness for dialogue and for
some concessions. As a result, the new
Russian attack will not lead to a toughening of the position of the West and a
strengthening of sanctions.” No one wants to irritate “’the Russian bear,’” and
everyone seems to think that there can be “’a peace process.’”
But such people
“do not understand that the Russian dictator needs all these talks in order to
soften the reaction of the West to the expanding occupation of Ukraine.” He has no intention of stopping. “He doesn’t
need the Donbas or even a mythical ‘Novorossiya.’ He wants to destroy the
independence of Ukraine.”
Putin has never accepted the
overthrow of Yanukovich, the Moscow commentator says, and he will continue to
fight until he has “his own new puppet” in Kyiv, a kind of “Yanukovich-2.”
“The chief problem for the world,”
he continues, is that “the Russian president is ill.” He views himself as a
great historical figure blest by God and undefeatable -- rather than a minor
chekist officer he in fact is who came to power thanks “to a tragic chain of
accidental circumstances.”
Given his mania, Putin has “decided
neither more nor less to subordinate Ukraine to himself.” Such an idea is
ultimately condemned to failure, but he cannot admit that to himself or others
and is counting on others to help him achieve his goal.
Felgegauer, perhaps Russia’s most
distinguished independent military analyst, says that those dealing with Moscow
on Ukraine “need to understand what Russia’s strategic goals are.” These are “now
completely understandable” and involve in the first instance “regime change in
Kyiv.”
Putin doesn’t like the current cast
of leaders in Ukraine, but that is far from the central issue, Felgengauer
continues. “Moscow is interested in a
constitutional reform in Ukraine which will guarantee what Russia needs” –
keeping Ukraine out of Western organizations and maintaining its neutrality.
Moscow wants a Ukraine in which
“pro-Russian forces there will have a veto.” It doesn’t care about Ukrainian
territory “as such.” It is interested
“not so much in the Donbas as in Kyiv and in having definite control over all
of Ukraine which in general must be a country with limited sovereignty.”
In pursuit of that goal, Felgengauer
says, Moscow is applying “various kinds of pressure on Ukraine: military,
political and economic with the goal of destabilizing the situation and
changing the regime.”
Russia doesn’t yet have a candidate
to take over in Kyiv. It even, the Moscow military analyst says, “still hopes
that Petro Poroshenko ‘will think it over’” and be prepared to agree to what
Moscow wants. It is even “not against”
the notion that the extreme right might seize power given that this would
isolate Kyiv from the West by appearing to confirm Russia’s line.
“Obozrevatel,”
the Ukrainian outlet to which Felgengauer gave his interview, summed up his
remarks in the following way: Given Putin’s goals of subordinating all of
Ukraine rather than seizing the Donbas, “negotiations will not help; it is
necessary either to win in war or lose sovereignty.”
No comments:
Post a Comment