Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 10 – Given both
Vladimir Putin’s moves to centralize almost all decisions and the sensitivity
of many Russians to the possibility that the eastern portions of the Russian
Federation will fall under Chinese domination, the statement of Moscow’s top
official in the Russian Far East is striking.
Yury Trutnyev, deputy prime minister
and presidential plenipotentiary for the Far East Federal District, said on
Tuesday that “there was no need” for Moscow to get involved in the issue of
rental of land in the Far East to China. Regional officials are fully capable
of handling the situation (ng.ru/economics/2015-07-10/1_china.html).
Trutnyev’s
comments come as ever more governors in Siberia and the Far East say they would
be happy to rent land to China – Sverdlovsk oblast head Yevgeny Kuybashev did
so also on Tuesday – as a means of raising money for their regions at a time
when Moscow has cut back their subsidies.
In
a comment about this in today’s “Nezavisimaya gazeta,” the paper’s Mikhail
Sergeyev, says that “the impression is being created that local officials of
the Russian Federation are interested in the land expansion of the Chinese and
that “a detailed discussion of all the consequences would only interfere with
such plans.
The
possibility that regions in the Russian Far East will go through with plans to
rent land to China and allow Chinese workers to come to work them has already
sparked controversy. (See windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/06/beijing-wants-moscow-to-agree-to.html and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/06/trans-baikal-kray-government-plan-to.html.)
Sergeyev’s
write up today was sparked by the appearance in an official Chinese communist
party publication yesterday of an article by an expert from Russia declaring
that Russia and Russians had nothing to fear and everything to gain from
allowing China to rent Russian lands and sent personnel to farm them.
The
Chinese publication of this Russian article now, Aleksey Maslov of Moscow’s
Higher School of Economics says, “cannot be accidental.” He notes that there
are “hundreds of analysts” in China who keep track of the Russian media and
routinely select articles which accept and even promote the Chinese position.
Maslov
adds that he has nothing personal against renting land to China, but he points
out that “so far such projects have not been worked up at the expert level
which would assess all the economic, demographic and agricultural consequences.” Local officials “do not have the experience
of dealing with the Chinese and proceed only from temporary local interests.”
But
for the time being, Moscow seems prepared to allow the regional governments to
proceed on their own. That may be
because the Kremlin believes there is no harm in such activities, or
alternatively, it may be because the Kremlin wants someone else to do the dirty
work, someone who can be disowned and dismissed if there is too much
opposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment