Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 10 – The mass
protests in Russia and those in Belarus increasingly resemble one another, the
result, Russian journalist Semyon Novoprudsky says, is the unwillingness of the
authorities to listen to the people on political issues or engage in any
dialogue with them.
In an interview given to Yegor
Slepakov of Belgazeta, Novoprudsky
argues that this reflects certain shared characteristics of Vladimir Putin and
Alyaksandr Lukashenka. Both see themselves as “fathers of their nations,” and both
believe they cannot be challenged by the elite or the population (belgazeta.by/ru/1091/topic_week/34435/).
The two leaders differ in fact “only
in their political origin.” Lukashenka has “more political experience,” while
Putin “never thought of being a public politician and has no experience of unfiltered
exchanges with people,” the journalist says. And their reliance on polls gets
them in trouble.
No one really knows how many
Russians actually “support the annexation of Crimea,” Novoprudsky says; nor
does anyone know “whether people (above all the elite) in such closed political
regimes as Russia and Belarus will publicly defend the powers that be in the
case of turbulence [or] whether people are prepared to show sympathy if a protest
arises.”
Putin will have to address the
economic situation because Russians “will not live for long” in a state of
military mobilization: “No military consciousness can be the basis of a firm
power for decades.” But just how far
Russia is from escaping that consciousness is difficult to tell given the gap between
words and reality; in Belarus, it is clearer.
Novoprudsky explains that when the
Soviet Union was falling apart, he lived in Uzbekistan. In that republic, there
was no real movement for independence; but at the same time, there was no real
support for the existing system. Something similar may be the case now in the
Russian Federation.
It is a matter of “great regret” that
“in Russia today, everything is connected with the political origin of Putin as
someone from the special services,” the journalist says. As a result, “the
genre of the special operation is the most popular form of political action in
Russia” and few things can be excluded.
In Belarus, a smaller country but
under a similar “information blockade,” it is “easier” to make specific
individuals into heroes whereas in Russia, people “do not live in a heroic time
and no one is becoming a hero.” As a
result, “however strange it may seem, the opposition in Belarus is more
personified and structured than in Russia.”
But there is one more way in which
the oppositions in the two countries are alike. In Belarus, the protests have
involved far more than just the traditional opposition figures in the capital;
and in Russia, they represent what Prague-based analyst Aleksandr Morozov has
called “the post-Crimean majority,” again a group far larger and more diverse
than the protesters of 2011-2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment