Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 23 – Independent
Chechen journalist Musa Muradov adds another dimension to Moscow’s complicated
relationship with those North Caucasians its security forces allowed to go to
fight for ISIS in Syria. He suggests that the Russian government did so in
order that as many would be killed as possible in ways allowing Moscow to avoid
responsibility.
He makes that point in the course of
an interview posted on the OnKavkaz portal (onkavkaz.com/news/1975-musa-muradov-siloviki-ne-meshali-vyezdu-kavkazskoi-molodezhi-v-siriyu-a-potom-nachali-ee-unicht.html).
The Russian force structures helped North Caucasus radicals leave, did not promote
anti-ISIS propaganda early on, and clearly hoped that those going would be
killed.
Such an arrangement would suit Moscow
perfectly, Muradov argues, because it would see many of those who might
otherwise fight against it in their homelands be killed in ways that Moscow
could plausibly argue it had nothing to do with, thus reducing the chance that
these deaths would lead to more anti-Russian feelings in the region.
(Muradov’s words do not mean that other
reports which suggest that some of the ISIS fighters from the North Caucasus
were Russian agents under various degrees of control and may, now that Moscow
is helping to extract them, be used elsewhere. On that possibility, see windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/11/moscows-extraction-of-isis-cadres-from.html).
Kavkaz-Uzel reports on another
Syrian-North Caucasus development. Asker Bor, a Circassian activist, says Damascus
is actively opposing the departure of Circassians from that country, an
opposition that Moscow is fully respecting even as it is pulling some others
from the North Caucasus out (kavkaz-uzel.eu/blogs/1927/posts/30769).
No comments:
Post a Comment