Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 15 – Now that
some are describing British Prime Minister Theresa May’s speech on the Russian
threat as an update of Churchill’s Fulton speech, that began the Cold War, the
Kremlin is about to learn that it is quite easy to become a universal outcast
but far more difficult to recover from that status, at least without a change
at the top.
Yevgeny Platon, a Ukrainian
businessman and commentator, has put the former proposition most clearly: May’s
speech, he writes, is “in essence the Fulton speech of Churchill” and thus
constitutes “an official declaration of Cold War 2.0 on the Russian Federation”
(gordonua.com/blogs/platon/vcherashnyaya-rech-mey-po-suti-fultonskaya-rech-cherchillya-oficialnoe-obyavlenie-rossii-holodnoy-voyny-20-217292.html).
Rosbalt commentator Ivan
Preobrazhensky expands on this point. He notes that May accused the Russian authorities
“and Vladimir Putin personally” of seeking to use “information as a weapon,”
annexing Crimea, “unleashing war in Ukraine, and conducting cyber-war” there
and elsewhere (rosbalt.ru/russia/2017/11/14/1660742.html).
The Kremlin has done all this
because it “underrates the firmness of contemporary democracies and open
societies” and thus will become ever more isolated from them unless and until
it changes is policies. But already, May
suggested and Preobrazhensky agrees, Russia is in a very different place than
it was.
“Earlier Russia was one of the world
centers of attraction, often more military and cultural than economic but all
the same a center.” Now, however, “this
picture is rapidly changing. By its inept foreign policy, the Kremlin has
allowed for the transformation of Russia into ‘a universal threat.’”
Preobrazhensky continues: “Now
whenever anyone needs to distract attention from its own inept or aggression policy,
all he has to do is mention Russia. That is how the Bulgarians, Poles, Czechs,
Dutch, French, British, and Americans are already actin. And soon, to judge
from everything, this trend will go beyond the limits of ‘the Euro-Atlantic
community.’”
“All powers sometimes make mistakes.
And it is very convenient when there is one universal threat for the entire
world to which all problems can be ascribed.” Such a stereotype can be employed
without much argument precisely because it is so widely accepted, the Rosbalt
commentator says.
But for Russia and its future, “with
or without Putin,” this is “a very dangerous development. To gain the reputation of ‘a universal evil,’
it turns out, isn’t too difficult. But to escape from it certainly will take
years and more likely decades.”
No comments:
Post a Comment