Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 1 – Russians are
constantly searching for a new leader to replace the one in office, while
Ukrainians are seeking to defend their rights and freedoms, “a principle
difference” between the two nations and one where Russia, not Ukraine, has put
itself on the path to “a dead end,” according to Andrey Illarionov.
“In Ukraine, people came out into
the square not for a Ukrainian Navalny or for Ukrainian Navalnys,” he says.
Instead, “in Ukraine, people came out in defense of their rights and freedoms,
standing up to and protesting a repressive, authoritarian, and corrupt regime”
(svoboda.org/content/transcript/26767371.html).
What has been taking place in Russia
in recent years and perhaps decades is a constant search for some leader, be it
Navalny, Khodorkovsky or someone else. Instead of one leader, who is in the
Kremlin, with us, there is a constant search for some other leader,” the
Russian analyst says.
“If [Russians] remain on this path,” Illarionov says, “then
we will never get out of that dead end in which we find ourselves. As far as the mass appearance of people on the
streets as a result of a political crisis, I do not very much believe in that …
Let’s recall the transition of power from Stalin to the triumvirate, from the triumvirate
to Khrushchev, from Khrushchev to Brezhnev, from Brezhnev to Andropov.”
In each case, the actual change was the work of “a
maximum of several dozen people and was not accompanied by any mass movements.”
Illarionov’s comment on this most profound difference
between Russians and Ukrainians, one that is often obscured by Western media
coverage which tends to focus on what it imagines to be a horse race for the
top job, points to the best reason for optimism about the future of Ukraine and
the most compelling reason for pessimism about Russia, at least in 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment