Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 13 – Given the
rise in xenophobia in Russian society following Vladimir Putin’s invasion of
Ukraine and his increasingly repressive authoritarianism at home, many have
pointed to the danger that anti-Semitism, one of the ugliest plagues of Russian
history, is making a comeback.
Russian officials and commentators
have proudly and up to a point accurately noted that what anti-Semitism there currently
is in Putin’s Russia is incomparably less than there was in late Soviet or
imperial times. But there are signs there claims are increasingly hollow. (See windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/01/putin-retains-soviet-style-anti.html
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2016/11/russian-society-far-from-free-of-anti.html.)
Developments in the past month are
especially worrisome and those this week are even more so because they suggest
that contrary to what the Kremlin claims, Russian officials are giving aid and
comfort to at least some anti-Semites and thus sending a signal to Russians
that the limits of the permissible in attacking Jews have expanded.
Not only are Russian officials very
publicly working to deport a rabbi and his family from Sochi as security risks
(windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/02/moscow-wants-to-deport-sochi-rabbi-as.html),
but they have opened a case against someone who used to repost to criticize a Duma
deputy who said Jews in the past “boiled Christians in pots.”
Yesterday, during a demonstration in
St. Petersburg in support of handing over to the Russian Orthodox Church St.
Isaac’s Cathedral, Duma deputy Vitaly Milonov told the crowd that Jews, because
of age-old hatreds, were orchestrating opposition to the return of the cathedral
(ixtc.org/2017/02/vitaliy-milonov-obvinil-evreev-v-tom-chto-oni-varili-hristian-v-kotlah/).
“Christians survived,” he said,
despite the fact that the ancestors of Boris Lazrevich Vishnevsky and Maksim
Lvovich Reznik [two Jewish deputies in the St. Petersburg legislative assembly
who oppose handing the cathedral back to the Russian Orthodox Church] boiled us
in pots and fed the remains to beasts.”
Milonov added that “if there weren’t
these new anti-priests and provocateurs, there wouldn’t have been any protests”
about the church transfer. But the two Jewish deputies, he continued, were “using
this situation for political PR.”
Such an outrageous expression of
anti-Semitism should have been condemned by all people of good will, but
instead of joining them, the Russian government took a step which at least some
Russians will see as an indication of just what side of the debate about Jews
the Kremlin is on.
As the New Chronicle of Current
Events reported, they instead brought new charges against Open Russia activist
Dmitry Semenov for reporting a picture of the very same Duma deputy wearing a
t-shirt reading ‘Orthodoxy or Death” (ixtc.org/2017/02/politsiya-vozbuzhdaet-dela-za-fotografii-vitaliya-milonova/#more-13086).
Nominally, of course, the Russian
authorities claimed they were combatting extremism which they suggested Semenov
was promoting by reposting this picture. But few if any Russians or others except
those who are prepared to justify anything Moscow does are going to read this step
in that way.
And in a development unrelated to
this back and forth, the Russian Imperial House attacked the Jewish banking
house of the Rothschilds for supposedly facilitating, on behalf of the United
States, the theft of the Russian gold reserve from Russia (facebook.com/ppryanikov/posts/1426690110709377).
No comments:
Post a Comment