Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 24 – Vladimir
Putin told Russian military leaders yesterday that Moscow now estimates that
there are some 4,000 Russian citizens and 5,000 citizens of other CIS countries
fighting for ISIS in Syria and that in the event that they return home from the
Middle East, they constitute a serious threat for Russia.
That is why defeating ISIS in Syria
is so important, he suggested in what appears to be his latest effort to
mobilize Russian public opinion behind his military actions there. But there
are two facts that the Kremlin leader chose not to mention in the course of his
remarks (graniru.org/Politics/Russia/President/m.259017.html).
On the one hand, these new figures
are significantly larger than the ones he and other senior Russian officials
have given in the past. In Octobeer
2015, for example, Putin himself put the total number of ISIS fighters from
Russia and the CIS state taken together at between 5,000 and 7,000.
The new figures suggest that Moscow
has not stemmed the flow of its citizens into the ranks of the Islamic State.
Indeed, its increasingly repressive anti-Muslim actions in the North Caucasus
may have produced the exodus behind the new numbers.
And on the other hand, Putin did not
acknowledge what more junior Russian officials have confirmed in the past. The
Kremlin played a key role in the departure of many people from the North
Caucasus into the ISIS ranks earlier when in order to avoid a possible
terrorist incident at the Sochi Olympiad, the FSB actually encouraged and
assisted radicals to leave the country.
That explains his continuing calls
for a harsh even brutal and murderous Russian campaign in Syria: Moscow doesn’t
want those it helped to go there to be able to come back alive, and it wants to
hide its earlier role in helping Russian citizens to join the ISIS ranks by
casting its effort now as simply part of an anti-terrorist campaign.
“All of this is a direct threat to
Russia,” Putin said, “and our military personnel in Syria are first of all
defending their own country. Our actions there are not dictated … by abstract
geopolitical interests or the desire to train and test new arms systems.”
Instead, they are about “blocking a threat” to Russia itself.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment