Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 18 – In the
course of an interview with Kyiv’s Apostrophe portal, Russian commentator
Andrey Illarionov says that “Belarus is candidate number one for a Russian
invasion,” a conclusion that takes on added weight given that the Kremlin is
likely to view anti-Lukashenka protests as a cover for such actions just as it
did earlier in Ukraine.
“No state in Europe can be completely
isolated from possible aggression of an informational, corruption,
propagandistic, espionage or hybrid character,” Illarionov says; but “as far as
its conventional [form] is concerned, Belarus at present is candidate number
one” (apostrophe.ua/article/world/ex-ussr/2017-02-18/andrey-illarionov-belarus--kandidat-1-na-vtorjenie-rossii/10244).
The probability of
Russia’s invading Belarus depends “above all,” he says, “on the state of
Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s health and the stability of his round-the-clock ties
with other members of the Belarusian leadership.” If the Belarusian president
were to be out of contact for 24 hours, “extremely serious temptations and risk
could arise.”
On the one hand, Illarionov says, Moscow
depends on Lukashenka: “Practically any other Belarusian government would adopt
a course toward integration with Europe.”
But on the other, Moscow is increasingly angry at Lukashenka for his
independence and may want to take more radical measures to bring Minsk back
into line.
The Kremlin has several possible
options, ranging from replacing Lukashenka with someone on whom Russia can rely
more confidently while allowing Belarus to preserve its “formal national
independence” or take steps toward “the complete integration of that country
into Russia,” something that would require at a minimum a show of extreme
force.
Illarionov’s
analysis is given new urgency by developments in Belarus in the last several
days, including the largest mass demonstration against Lukashenka since 2010.
That is because, if Vladimir Putin follows the script he did in Ukraine, he may
see such popular actions as portending another Maidan that would take Belarus
even further out of Russia’s orbit.
Three years ago, Putin invaded
Ukraine and illegally annexed Crimea, albeit in his favored “hybrid” way that
allowed him to deny and many to accept his denials that that is exactly what he
had done and is doing. And the Kremlin
leader may remain convinced that the West, especially in its current disorder,
will not take serious steps to block any such move.
Moreover, the likelihood that Putin
will now decide on an invasion is likely increased by one aspect of the
situation in Minsk that recalls Kyiv in 2013 and that is more frightening to
the Kremlin leader than almost any other. The mass protest was not organized by
the traditional opposition parties but was spontaneous from below and thus
political in a new way.
That point has been made by two Belarusian
outlets (belaruspartisan.org/politic/371381/
and naviny.by/article/20170217/1487356921-marsh-vozmushchennyh-belorusov-v-strane-ozhivaet-politicheskiy-protest),
and Moscow is likely to view this protest not as just the latest in a long line
of Belarusian discontent but as something fundamentally new and threatening.
If that is the case, Putin is likely to
move against Belarus in the coming days, especially if there are no clear
signals from the West that such a move would make absolutely impossible any
cooperation with Russia in the foreseeable future.
No comments:
Post a Comment