Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 10 – Xenophobia
and ethnic intolerance remain far higher in Russia than in other countries and
could easily explode in the near future, according to experts who call for
dismissing the overly optimistic reports of some sociologists that because they
focus on only one aspect of the problem suggest otherwise.
Speaking at a roundtable this week
on media and ethnicity, Vikor Shpirelman of the Moscow Institute of Ethnology
and Anthropology, cited Microsoft data showing that 32 percent of Russian
Internet posts were infected by the language of hatred compared to only 14
percent for the world as a whole (nazaccent.ru/content/23140-ekspert-ne-stoit-doveryat-dannym-o.html).
That should cause everyone to be extremely
skeptical of reports minimizing the problem or even suggesting that it no
longer exists. Iosif Diskin of the Social
Chamber agreed as did ethnographer Dmitry Gromov who said that observed that
some statements on Moscow TV talk shows should have brought charges of
extremism but haven’t.
In “Nezavisimaya gazeta” yesterday, the
paper’s senior political reporter Ivan Rodin discussed one of the recent
reports that some have cited to make overly optimistic comments and showed that
a more careful reading of its contents would lead to conclusions diametrically
opposite those some are making (ng.ru/politics/2017-02-09/1_6926_nacionalist.html).
The report in question is the annual
survey by the Moscow Human Rights Bureau of aggressive xenophobia, radical
nationalism and extremism. This year it concludes that these phenomena are “gradually
becoming less common.” But it warns that
this trend is not yet “stable” and that it reflects largely the collapse of the
Russian nationalist camp.
Because Russian nationalists have
become less active and influential in the wake of the annexation of Crimea and
the wars in Syria and the Donbass, the report says, the numbers of incidents
involving xenophobia, radical nationalism and extremism have fallen each of the
last two years.
But that trend is not necessarily
true of other kinds of intolerance, the Moscow Human Rights Bureau says. In fact,
its report says, “Islamist movements have become more active as a result of the
efforts of ISIS … in the Caucasus and the Middle Volga” and the efforts of
Russian law enforcement officials to counter them, which boost the numbers that
the group counts.
Thus, the report continues, while
there has been progress in one sector – among organized Russian nationalist groups
– there has not been progress in others; and “the nationalist protest potential
[in Russia] has been maintained.” Indeed, it says, “in the future, the organs
of power and the political elite must be prepared for new outbursts of activity
given the crisis in the economy.”
Two other articles this week make a
similar point. One says that Russian hostility toward and even hatred of ethnic
Ukrainians is on the rise (svpressa.ru/society/news/166050/),
and another says that popular hatred of other ethnic groups is too even if
Russian nationalist organizations are weaker than they were (kp.ru/daily/26641.4/3660354/).
No comments:
Post a Comment