Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 17 – In a seminal
and multi-faceted presentation to the Liberal Mission Foundation, Vadim Sidorov
argues that the formation of a Russian nation state based on a civic Russian
national identity is not a viable option because of the imperial nature of
Putin’s rule and because of a fundamental divide between ethnic Russians and
non-Russians.
At the end of the imperial period
and at the end of Soviet times, the regional theorist continues, a certain
number of commentators discussed the possibility of creating a common civic
Russian nation and based on it a Russian nation state, the regionalist
commentator says; but at neither point was much progress made in either
direction (liberal.ru/articles/7417).
Now, some believe that the current
regime given its new Strategy of State National Policy will be able to create
“’an all-Russian civic identity … based on the preservation of the dominance of
Russian culture and informing all the peoples of the Russian Federation” and on
the basis of this civic nation a Russian nation state.
But Vladimir Putin’s rule, whatever
he says about creating a civic nation and a nation state, is “an absolutist
power, hostile to any genuine civic participation and thus isn’t national in
the modern European sense. Instead, it is imperial not only because “it is not
controlled by its on nation which Russia lacks” but also because it seeks to
rule over other peoples and lands.
If 25 years ago Russian liberals
spoke about creating “’a liberal empire,’” now they are more inclined to speak
about setting up “’a nation state’ as an alternative to Putinism,” Sidorov
says. But there are at least two aspects
of the situation that cast “serious doubts” that such an entity would be viable
“in Russian conditions.”
On the one hand, he says, any civic
nation of Russians would face “serious competitors in the form of other
nations. No, not ethnoses, which theoretically could integrate into a single
civic nation, as Russian liberals going back to the Kadets and Struve have
presupposed but in fact political nations.”
“Today we see this in civic
protests in Russia which in ethnic Russian areas generally involve only a thin
stratum of the population concentrated in major cities but in the case of national
republics like Kalmykia, Buryatia, Sakha and Ingushetia, the protests are large
and all-national in character. [stress supplied]
“These [non-Russian] protest
movements have a clearly expressed national agenda just as they did at the
beginning and end of the last century. When they encountered them, the
Bolsheviks recognized the right of nations to self-determination not out of
great love for small peoples … but simply because they really wanted to win in
the war for power and unlike the Whites understood that it was necessary to do
so.”
And on the other hand, Sidorov
continues, there is an underlying problem with “the Russian nation” that helps
to explain why only the educated stratum of 10 to 15 percent is prepared to act
as a nation. It is this: the Bolsheviks created the Russian nation in its
current form out of a population that was not yet ready to become one.
And after the Bolsheviks did so –
one must remember that in tsarist times, there was no official reference to an
ethnic Russian nation – the Soviet system which wanted to hold all those in
this category within an imperial matrix did not allow it to develop in ways
that might have led to the creation of a
national movement.
Such a movement would have been
fatal to the Soviet project, and the communist administration worked hard and successfully
to prevent its emergence as anything more than a marginal intellectual game. As
a result, while there are numerous political nations existent among the
non-Russians, Sidorov says, there isn’t a sizeable one among Russians.
The Kremlin may be able to promote Russian
language and Russian culture as core values for its population, but it is
highly unlikely to be willing to allow the emergence of a genuine Russian
nation ethnic or civic because either if it took off would be a threat to the Putin
system.
No comments:
Post a Comment