Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 22 – This fall,
there has been an unprecedented number of major meetings of Russian democrats
in European cities, but it is a mistake to describe them as émigré actions
because only about one in ten of the participants is an exile in the way that
Herzen or Solzhenitsyn was, Aleksandr Morozov says.
Instead, most either come from
Russia or live part of the time there and part abroad, the Russian commentator
says; but their growing number not only is the product of growing repression at
home where such meetings are now almost impossible but also help to attract
international attention and promote change at home (graniru.org/opinion/m.277918.html).
Among
the most prominent of these meetings recently were the SlovoNovo forum in
Montenegro, the Boris Nemtsov Forum in Warsaw, the Free Russia Forum in
Vilnius, the Russian Speakers for European Values meeting in Berlin, and the
Russia for Citizens conference in the German capital. Also in Berlin there was
a forum ‘In Search of Lost Universalism.”
These
meetings are taking place abroad because the ability to hold them inside Russia
is ever more limited. The only democratic
spaces left in Moscow are the Sakharov Center and Memorial in Moscow. Beyond
the ring road, such assemblages have become completely impossible.
The
goals of the organizers vary widely. Zhanna Nemtsov wants to keep the memory of
her murdered father alive and maintain communication between Russian democrats
and those above. Gary Kasparov has a
more directly political agenda focused on how to replace the Putin regime while
Marat Gelman and Anton Litvin have a more artistic focus.
Igor
Eidman seeks to organize anti-Putin activists living in or passing through
Berlin. Elena Nemirovskya and Yury Senokosov who operating training schools in
Russia until they were listed as foreign agents have simply shifted their
efforts to foreign soil. And Mikhail Khodorkovsky is using his new one to bring
together Open Russia followers.
Many
ask what good do these meetings do. But that question is typically rhetorical
because in fact at a time of rising repression in Russia itself, such meetings
do make a contribution by promoting discussion, showing that opposition to the
regime continues, and attracting attention at home and abroad, Morozov
concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment