Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 9 – Vladimir
Putin’s recent attack on those he says are attacking the Russian language has
attracted more attention (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/11/dont-call-russian-language-weapon-lest.html),
but at the same meeting, remarks by Vladimir Alpatov are likely to prove the
move important in terms of Moscow’s next moves on the language front.
Alpatov, head of the research center
for national-language relations at the Academy of Sciences Institute of Linguistics,
said that his institution has come up with draft legislation that would end what
he said was Tatarstan’s failure to live according to the spirit as well as the
letter of existing law on languages of instruction.
As
Ilnar Garifullin, a commentator for the Idel.Real portal says,
that makes Tatarstan “the target” of Moscow’s campaign to boost Russian while
reducing the number of non-Russians not only in that republic but across the
Russian Federation studying in
non-Russian languages and toward that end cutting in half (idelreal.org/a/30260286.html).
Alpatov suggested that the number of
hours Tatar-language students should study Tatar each week should be further
reduced form six hours to three. And despite his call for “defending”
non-Russian languages, his approach like Putin’s would lead to the
disappearance of non-Russian languages and therefore “the disappearance” of the
language issue.
What the remarks of both Putin and
Alpatov mean, Garifulllin says, is that “the former course of the most
far-reaching Russification” has been confirmed “and not simply Russification
but the most far-reaching unitarization of the country, the liquidation of the national
republics and the construction of some ‘[non-ethnic] Russian’ nation.”
And they mean something else as
well, the commentator continues. “Questions of language and culture are completely
political.” Nothing threatens the Russian these people want to defend, but they
are threatening the non-Russian languages to the point of extinction and few
are coming to the defense of these basic building blocks of culture.
On the Tatar Politics telegram
channel, Kazan activist Ruslan Aisin has proposed that the government of
Tatarstan in response to what Moscow is doing create a Presidential Council on
the Tatar Language analogous to the federal one supporting Russian (t.me/tpolit/1730). That is an absolutely
necessary step, Garifullin says; but it is far from clear whether Kazan will
take it.
“There is a real war going on
against Tatar. And we are absolutely unprepared for it organizationally and ideologically,”
he continues. Moscow has chosen Tatar as
the target because if it breaks Tatar, all the other non-Russians will have
little choice but to fall in line and accept the destruction of their languages
and then their republics as well.
Tragically, Garifulllin points out,
there are many in Tatarstan, like Radif Zamaletdinov of the Institute of Philology
and Inter-Cultural Communication at the Kazan Federal University, who are calling
in the most servile fashion for Tatars to take the lead in promoting not Tatar
but Russian.
Such people are seeking to curry
favor with Moscow; but any victories they have will be short-lived, the Idel.Real
observer says, because they forget that Moscow will be willing to use them only
as long as it has to to achieve its goals – and then they will be disposed of
just as the center has disposed of Tatar institutions and individuals in the
past.
No comments:
Post a Comment