Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 2 – While the actual
number of amendments will be much small and affect only those areas Vladimir
Putin wants to see changes made, Russians both formally through the working
group on constitutional change and informally via the media have made literally
hundreds of proposals for change (kp.ru/daily/27086.5/4158547/).
These range from inserting God and
ethnic Russians into the Constitution to removing “multi-nationality” and
republics from it – see, e.g., echo.msk.ru/news/2580972-echo.html,
snob.ru/society/patriarh-kirill-predlozhil-vpisat-boga-v-konstituciyu/, idelreal.org/a/30412540.html, credo.press/228917/,
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/02/opposition-to-changing-russian.html.
The appearance of so many proposals
is important for at least three reasons. First, it suggests that Russians have
less than a clear idea of what a constitution is as compared to a law given
that many of the proposals – and this is true of some of Putin’s as well – want
to put in the Constitution ideas that can be dealt with by ordinary laws.
Second, it signals that Russians do
have a wide variety of ideas that they want their government to take seriously,
something the regime rarely does, and feel that the call to discuss the Constitution
is the perfect perhaps even only time when they have a chance to be heard and
possibly taken seriously even if their proposals aren’t adopted.
And third, the richness of these
proposals suggests that those who make them may react differently after they
are ignored than before they made them because having spent the time offering them,
they will then more clearly see what the powers that be in Moscow are prepared
to accept.
Consequently, whatever the Kremlin’s
intentions, this constitutional process may prove to be a mobilizing process –
and demobilization may be more difficult for the authorities than they
suspect.
No comments:
Post a Comment