Paul Goble
Staunton, February 7 – The so-called
Donetsk Peoples Republic has declared itself to be the successor to the
Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic which existed nominally within Soviet Russia
in February-March 1918 between Ukraine’s signing a treaty with Germany and
Soviet Russia’s signing the treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
The 1918 variant presented itself as
a response to the German challenge, defined itself as being part of Soviet
Russia rather than part of Ukraine, and claimed territories far in excess of
those it actually controlled, three things that may have recommended it to the
current leaders of the DPR and their Moscow backers.
In addition to those factors which the authors
of this week’s declaration stress, there is another one that should give
Ukrainians and their supporters pause: After the 1918 statelet was liquidated
by Moscow, its leaders moved on to Kharkiv and helped form the Bolshevik
government of Soviet Ukraine.
The Donetsk-Kriovoy Rog Soviet
Republic was never recognized by anyone, including Soviet Russia, but its
utility for Moscow was shown when it was liquidated by Moscow and folded into
the Ukrainian Soviet Republic and when many of its leaders then moved on to
Kharkiv and helped form the Bolshevik government of Soviet Ukraine.
On Thursday, the Peoples Council of
the DPR approved and released a memorandum stating that the current “republic”
considers itself to be “the legal successor” of the 1918 one and asserting,
incorrectly, that the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic had never ceased to exist de jure (inforesist.org/boeviki-predyavili-pretenzii-na-territorii-xarkovskoj-zaporozhskoj-xersonskoj-i-dnepropetrovskoj-oblastej/).
The memorandum notes that in 1918,
the DKR included “the territories of Kharkiv and Yekaterinoslav guberniyas,
Krivoy Rog of Kherson gubernia, part of the districts of Tavride gubernia, and
the industrial regions of the Oblast of the Don Cossack Forces.” In fact, the DKR claimed all of these but did
not control most of them.
And the memorandum concludes with an
appeal to all “peoples living on the territory of Ukraine which at one time
were ‘part of the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog republic and also other oblasts … to
become full-fledged subjects of ‘the Donetsk Peoples Republic,’” according to
the Inforesist report.
Commenting on the DPR action,
Aleksandr Kazakov, the director of the Moscow Stolypin-Struve Center for
Liberal-Conservative Policy, says that this memorandum “changes the entire
political configuration in the region” and thus needs to be attended to most
closely (actualcomment.ru/v-dnr-prinyat-memorandum-ob-istoricheskoy-preemstvennosti.html).
Kazakov says the declaration is
important because it means that it is no longer possible to call the people
behind the DPR “separatists” as they are simply restoring something that
existed earlier rather than breaking away from any country. But there is an even more important aspect
from his point of view.
According to the Moscow analyst, it
is important to recall that the 1918 DKR was created not as an ethnically-based
territory but rather was “a region formed according to economic principles,”
something that makes it an additional threat to the current arrangements in the
post-Soviet space.
Meanwhile, another commentator
interviewed by the same outlet, Viktor Zakharov, the deputy director of the
Moscow Institute of Russian History, lays stress on the fact that the DKR was “initially
founded as part of Russia” and there had no relationship to the Ukrainian state
or anything ethnic. The same thing is true of the DPR now, he insists.
No comments:
Post a Comment