Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 5 – At a time when
many are unwilling to label Russian actions in Ukraine an invasion lest they
offend Moscow or be forced to assume any responsibility for stopping it, a
Ukrainian diplomat has introduced some clarity in the situation by demanding
that Russian officials end their duplicitous practice of referring to
Ukrainians as “a fraternal people.”
At a meeting in Warsaw last week of
the OSCE bureau on democratic institutions and human rights, Anatoly Viktorov,
the head of the Russian delegation said that “that which is taking place in
Ukraine is not simply an armed conflict of an international character as the
International Committee of the Red Cross, this is a tragedy of what is to us
the fraternal Ukrainian people” (mk.ru/politics/2014/10/03/dozhili-kiev-poprosil-moskvu-ne-nazyvat-ukrainskiy-narod-bratskim.html).
In
response, Marianna Betsa, the head of the Ukrainian delegation to the meeting,
said that she “would ask the members of the Russian delegation not to call our
peoples fraternal.” That status, she suggested, was something that was now “in
the past” rather than a description of current realities.
She
was supported in this by Ambassador Daniel Baer, the US representative to the
OSCE, who said that hebelived “that it is obvious to all in this hall that the
actions taken against the Ukrainian people” are anything but those of a “fraternal”
people. To say otherwise would be “an enormous understatement.”
It
seems unlikely that Moscow will cease and desist on this point any more than it
has on other aggressive actions and statements about Ukraine, given the deep
roots such verbiage have in the Soviet past and Vladimir Putin’s continuing invocation
of this idea, most recently at the “Russia Calls” investment forum.
There
the Kremlin leader said that “Ukraine is not a country which is alien for us …
despite all the tragedy which we now observe, especially in the southeast,
the Ukrainian people always was and remains the closest for us, a fraternal
people. We are linked by ethnic, spiritual, religious and historical commonalities.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment