Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 10 – “Societies
which experience historical traumas, need anesthesia an psychotherapy,
sociologist Roman Abramov says. That often takes the form of nostalgia for
“’the good old times,’” which in the Russian case for many but far from all was
the period of Brezhnev’s rule (https://iq.hse.ru/news/301388060.html).
“Waves of nostalgia became a
frequent phenomenon of the 20th century when major geopolitical
cataclysms, world wars, revolutions, and sharp social and technological changes
occurred,” he says on the basis of his investigations of nostalgia. Such
attitudes, he says, “played the role of anti-depressant, anesthesia and an
adaptive mechanism at one and the same time.”
“People attempted to find a peaceful
and well-off past and then lose themselves in it, forgetting their present
problems for a time, Abramov says. “But this escapism interest on it n the end
not infrequently helped them adapt to new conditions.” For Russians now, that
past time was the Brezhnev era; and interest in it is helping them to
cope.
Of course, he continues, that period
was not all of one piece. There was economic stagnation, the Afghan war, the
campaign against dissidents and the third wave emigration. But “these events
did not touch everyone and appear less traumatic” to society as a whole than
more recent ones.
The investigator adds that
“present-day societies with their ideologies of uninterrupted innovation and
change and the doing away with traditional systems of values have promoted the
growth of nostalgia.” Millions of people
not surprisingly respond to turning to a past real and often imagined to
provide them with reassurance.
“The nostalgic eco-system,” Abramov
says, “are a good example of the symbiosis of emotions, recollections,
practical actions, institutions, people and things. All of them transform reality,
giving it a nostalgic tone and at the same time stimulates nostalgic
consumption” of goods from the past.
“’The last Soviet generation’ using the
words of Aleksey Yurchak, the author of This was Forever Until It ended,
became the generator of popular museumification of the late ‘soviet’ world, which
arrived in large measure in 2009-2012.” There are many museums now about Soviet
life in the real and virtual worlds and set up by professionals and amateurs.
This trend, Abramov continues, has been
provoked by and is provoking the further development of museums, films, books
and exhibits about the crimes of the Soviet past and especially the GULAG.
Demographically, Soviet nostalgia has been greater in small cities and the countryside
and less in the major cities.
Soviet nostalgia in Russia has now
become a major focus of scholarly research, Abramov says, with researchers in
many disciplines making contributions to its description and meaning. This research began in the West but has no
engulfed many in the Russian Federation and the other post-Soviet states.
He gives two examples of especially
valuable work: Galina Orlova’s on the nuclear power researchers in Soviet times
(Vestnik Permskogo nationalnogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2
(2018): 108-126) and Valentina Kharkhun’s
study of museums on the victims of communism (uamoderna.com/md/memory-wars-muzeum-of-communism).
No comments:
Post a Comment