Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 10 – Western
investigators have long insisted that people take part in collective actions
such as protests for one of three reasons: a feeling of injustice, a belief
that only collective action can change things, and a politicized identity, that
is, a pre-existing identification with the cause the protest is organized to
advance.
But Dmitry Grigoryev, a specialist
at the International Research Laboratory for Socio-Cultural Research at
Moscow’s Higher School of Economics, says, on the basis of his study of
protests in Spain and in Russia that two other factors may play an even larger
determining role (iq.hse.ru/news/301573440.html).
On the one hand, he says, people may
be driven to take part in protests because of the ideology they accept. And on
the other, Grigoryev suggests, they may do so out of a sense of moral obligation,
a belief that participation is required to maintain their standing with others
who believe as they do.
Grigoryev’s additions are important
in the Russian context because they suggest that the ideology the Kremlin has
sought to impose with its stress on democracy and law may lead Russians to
protest when they conclude that the regime is hypocritically saying one thing
and then doing another.
And they are important because they
highlight the way in which the social pressures people feel because they are
members of some community may have more to do with why they go into the streets
than any personal conviction. At a
certain point, such people do not want to stand aside lest they be viewed as
outsiders.
No comments:
Post a Comment