Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 25 – There is an old
joke among lawyers that when in a case, the facts are against you, you argue
law; when the law is against you, you argue facts; and when both are against
you, you raise your voice. Something similar
helps to explain why Alyaksandr Lukashenka has just now stated openly Belarus
could disappear from the face of the earth.
On the one hand, given Vladimir
Putin’s aggressiveness, need for ever new foreign policies to distract from his
failures at home, and his oft-repeated desire that Russia and Belarus become a
genuine “union state,” Lukashenka’s remarks may appear to many as nothing more
than stating the obvious.
But on the other, few leaders are
going to state the obvious if it makes them look as desperate as Lukashenka’s
suggestion at the end of last week that unless Belarus makes an economic
breakthrough, he does not exclude the loss of Belarus’ independence and its
annexation by a neighbor, which certainly won’t be Ukraine, Poland or
Lithuania.
And that prompts two questions: why
is he doing this and why is he doing it now? There are at least five reasons
why Lukashenka may have decided on what can only be described as such a desperate
public confession before his own people and the world of weakness and danger (stoletie.ru/lenta/lukashenko_ne_iskluchil_poteru_nezavisimosti_belorussijej_195.htm).
They include the following:
1.
The
Belarusian economy is in increasingly bad shape, losing its market share in
Russia and increasingly harmed by Russian government tax policies and Moscow’s
unwillingness or inability to subsidize him as it has in the past (iarex.ru/news/58475.html, belsat.eu/ru/news/belarus-mozhet-poteryat-20-byudzhetnyh-dohodov-iz-za-nalogovogo-manevra-moskvy/
and belsat.eu/ru/in-focus/belorusskaya-promyshlennost-zarabatyvaet-na-sanktsiyah-protiv-kremlya/).
2.
Lukashenka’s
personal relationship with Vladimir Putin is deteriorating even more rapidly,
with the two failing to agree on any of the three agenda items at a recent
meeting and the Russian leader taking an ever harsher line against Lukashenka (rusmonitor.com/telegram-kanal-nezygar-putin-pokazal-lukashenko-mesto.html).
3.
Putin
is pressing for the establishment of a Russian air base in Belarus, something
Lukashenka has on occasion said he opposes, undoubtedly recognizing that such a
base, were it to open, would end any chances for a rapprochement with the West
anytime soon (belaruspartisan.org/politic/429416/).
4.
Lukashenka’s
pursuit of closer ties with the West has not been going well. He continues to
be criticized and even sanctioned by both the EU and the US for his brutal
treatment of his own citizens. He is no longer
“the last dictator in Europe” for them: Putin has certainly claimed that title
in the minds of most. But the West can demonize him and his regime and feel
good about making equally justifiable condemnations of Putin’s Russia.
5.
Lukashenka
faces a newly mobilized opposition as a result of his foolish willingness to
allow a restaurant to open on one of the holiest spots in Belarus, the site of the
Kuropaty mass graves from Stalinist times.
That has infuriated many who in the past have stayed on the sidelines of
protest, promising more problems for Lukashenka in the future.
The Belarusian leader has thus decided to
begin talking about the danger that his country could disappear entirely with
three distinct audiences in mind:
First of all, the Belarusian people who
certainly do not want to become six faceless oblasts in the Western part of the Russian
Federation and thus may again turn to him as the lesser of two evils because they
may conclude they have no other choice.
Second, the West, which is generally
allergic to border changes as its reaction to Putin’s Anschcluss of Crimea
shows and which might be expected to decide that backing Belarus and its
president is its only choice if the prospect is that Putin might move to seize
that country.
And third, Vladimir Putin as well.
Clearly, Lukashenka by stating the obvious has sent a message to the Kremlin
that he recognizes what Putin wants and that he will do what he has to in his
own country and with the West to prevent the Russian leader from eliminating
his country and with it his position.
Lukashenka’s calculation may not work, but
at least it makes sense in terms of his interests and at least in part the
interests of his own country.
No comments:
Post a Comment