Paul Goble
Staunton,
June 18 – Russians, especially those living east of the Urals, have long been
worried about Chinese economic penetration which includes taking water from
Lake Baikal, mining gold and coal, and even opening Chinese factories in places
where Russian ones have ceased to operate.
But now
there is a new worry: the sell-off of much of the forested land to China,
Beijing’s harvesting of almost all of it, and a looming environmental disaster
as a result of the destruction of animal habitats and drainage systems,
something compounded by Moscow’s recent announcement that it lacks the money to
fight fires in forests that are left.
The
Chelyabinsk news agency reports that the Chinese role is especially troubling
and is receiving more attention as a result of a film by writer Pavel Pashkov
of the Russia Taiga expedition showing what is going on (lentachel.ru/news/2018/06/14/prodali-kitaytsam-ves-sibirskiy-les.html reposted at kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5B26AC0754996).
The basic
conclusion Pashkov reaches is that “practically all the forest business now
belongs to the Chinese Peoples Republic” rather than to anyone or any firm
within the Russian Federation. “In
fact, he says, “Siberia has become a raw materials supplier for China” and that
means, he suggests, that “de facto Siberia already belongs to China.”
His investigation shows, the writer
says, that the Chinese not only own the forests but have created a completely
Chinese processing system so that few if any Russians in the region
benefit. Not surprisingly, Pashkov says,
“the population of Siberia is categorically against this Chinese advance and
against the wholesale cutting down of the forests.”
Tragically, he continues, the
Russian authorities “prefer to keep quiet about the problem and to ignore the opinion
of the citizenry.” They simply pocket the money the Chinese pay and look away.
They don’t even take action when Chinese firms and tourists push Russians out
of the way near Lake Baikal.
According to Pashkov, this problem
has assumed “threatening proportions.”
Moreover, as bad as it is in the Chelyabinsk area, everything suggests
that in the Far East of Russia, “the situation is still worse.” (He plans to travel there later this year and produce
another film about the destruction of “the unique eco-system” of Russia east of
the Urals.
He urges Russians throughout the
country to demand Moscow get involved to stop this disaster before it is too
late. “If we talk about the defense of Russia’s interests in the situation with
regard to Crimea,” Pashkov concludes, “then we should be shouting at the top of
our lungs about the Siberian problem,” the Chinese are creating.
While it is unlikely he is going to
win his campaign, Pashkov has made a decision which others seeking to change
Russian policy are increasingly taking: they are making films that can be shown
on line and win support that way, as Aleksey Navalny and others have. At the
very least, that strategy ensures that far more people know about a problem
that does any other.
No comments:
Post a Comment