Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 26 -- With every
victory of opposition figures at the municipal or regional level, the most
recent being that of a 28-year-old homemaker in Ust-Ilimsk, Russian experts
say, ever more Russians especially outside of major cities like Moscow are
realizing that their votes matter and that voting can be both an effective and
safe means of dissent.
Aleksandr Zhelenin of the Rosbalt
news agency surveyed three Moscow experts as to the meaning of the recent
victories by opposition candidates in municipalities and regions and asked them
whether the votes for the opposition reflected a sea change in Russian attitudes
about voting or simply was the product of local conditions (rosbalt.ru/russia/2019/03/26/1771855.html).
Aleksey
Makarkin, vice president of the Moscow Center for Political Technologies, said that
at present, it is more appropriate to speak about particular failures rather
than a country-wide change. Popular unhappiness with the regime is “far from
always” translated into negative voting. Indeed, it may lead first of all to people
not showing up to vote at all.
Actual voting for an opposition
figure, at least as of now, requires a conjunction of circumstances, he
suggests, including an attractive opposition figure and obvious failings and
shortcomings of the local representative of the party of power. Consequently, votes
against the latter should not be read most of the time as a negative referendum
on the powers that be.
Konstantin Kalachev, head of the Moscow
Political Experts Group, agreed; but he said it is becoming easier for Russians
to vote against the party of power because of declining ratings for top
officials and, in many cases, of regional and municipal leaders of United
Russia as well. Many of the “no” votes are a reflection of “a crisis of the system
of administration locally.”
According to
Kalachev, there are in present-day Russia “two means of expressing one’s protest”
– taking part in demonstrations which is in fact dangerous and voting against representatives
of the powers that be. “Elections are again becoming an instrument for the channeling
of protest as people understand that something depends on their votes.”
And Moscow political analyst Dmitry
Oreshkin added that these defeats reflect the fact that “the entire [political]
organism is sick and its immunity is weakened,” the result of 20 years of attacks
on elections and voting as significant actions and a development that has led
to the degradation of society.
The response of Russians to this
trend is often the product of where they live. In major cities, people simply
don’t take part in elections anymore. But in smaller cities and rural regions,
people still feel compelled to vote but vote “no.” Consequently, it is there that the opposition
has made the largest number of breakthroughs.
No comments:
Post a Comment