Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 21 – It has long
been common ground in the West that declining oil prices, either as the result
of government policy or technological innovation, helped to bring down the
Soviet Union and undermine Putin’s Russia because lower prices mean that Moscow
doesn’t get the income that it had when the prices were higher.
That conviction has only been
reinforced by the problems Vladimir Putin has had over the last decade at least
in part because of falling oil and gas prices brought on by the shale oil
revolution and declining international demand. And in most cases, this Western
belief has been echoed by analysts and commentators in Russia itself.
But in today’s Izvestiya, Dmitry Migunov argues such views are mistaken. In fact,
he says, falling oil and gas prices have slowed the turn to other forms of energy and thus ensured
Russia’s possession of major oil and gas reserves will remain a major source of
income for it far longer than expected (iz.ru/858440/dmitrii-migunov/podslastili-slantcevaia-revoliutciia-v-ssha-okazalas-vygodna-rossii).
Because prices have fallen, he says,
the shift to alternative forms of energy has slowed in many places. The price
of oil is now so low that it makes more economic sense, at least in the short
term that most businesses and governments care about, to remain with petroleum
than to shift to solar, wind or other sources.
For Russian oil producers and the
Russian state, Migunov says, all this is “good news” over the longer term if
not in the short. According to the Izvestiya writer, “there are no reasons
to suppose” that this situation will change significantly in the foreseeable
future – and so exporting oil will be a winner for Russia even at lower prices.
“All this means that the demand for
heavy kinds of oil will only be increasing, and Russia as a key producer of
such oil will be able to earn billions if not tens of billions of additional
dollars” – a development that should allow it to be in a good defensive
position if technology or politics change.
Migunov's argument is not without holes -- in the short term, falling prices mean lower incomes -- but it is compelling in two ways. On the one hand, it suggests that Moscow is coming to terms the new price of oil. And on the other, it represents a cautionary note to all those who have believed that falling oil prices will be the end of the Putin regime or even Russia.
Migunov's argument is not without holes -- in the short term, falling prices mean lower incomes -- but it is compelling in two ways. On the one hand, it suggests that Moscow is coming to terms the new price of oil. And on the other, it represents a cautionary note to all those who have believed that falling oil prices will be the end of the Putin regime or even Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment