Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 29 – Most people associate
the degradation of the Russian legal system only with outrageous charges and sentences
to high-profile defendants, but there is anther aspect that is possibly even more
serious, Aleksandr Podrabinek says. It occurs when Russians can’t count on courts
to protect them, take things into their own hands, and then are punished.
Two recent cases – a clash between
farmers in Rostov over pasture land that led to violence and a soldier in the
Transbaikal who in protecting himself from abuse killed eight – call attention
to this problem that affects far more Russians than do other kinds of legal
degradation, the longtime human rights activist says (newtimes.ru/articles/detail/187004?fcc).
“The civilized path of resolving
such disputes,” he continues, is in the courts and the judiciall system more
generally. “But who believes” that is possible in Russia? “In the majority of such cases, a decision by
a judge depends on a call from an influential person or on bribe given to the judge
for handing down the necessary verdict.”
“Who would turn to such a judge?”
According to Podrabinek, “distrust
in the courts and law” almost invariably generates a response which can “led to
tragic consequences” as in the 1870s when revolutionary Vera Zasulich shot St.
Petersburg mayor Fyodor Trepov because she could not get justice in the city’s courts.
“With disturbing inevitability,
similar situations are being repeated in our time,” the rights activist and
commentator says, citing the case of the Primorsky partisans as an example, and
pointing out that the failure of the legal system to deliver justice has the
effect of leading to ever more occasions that infuriate and thus radicalize the
population.
“One act of illegality gives birth
to another,” he says. And stopping this “conveyor belt of illegality is very
difficult and the longer it functions, the more difficult that becomes.” Russians
have concluded that it is hopeless to turn to the courts, and ever more of them
are taking justice into their own hands.
In any particular case, “one can
argue for a long time whether this is good or bad, but one can’t dispute the obvious
fact that when the law is silent, the border between justice and criminality becomes
invisible and sometimes disappears altogether.”
No comments:
Post a Comment