Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 28 – There are
four reasons why Russian military losses in Syria are rising sharply, Novyye izvestiya reports today but “the
main one” is that Vladimir Putin wants that conflict over before presidential
elections next spring (newizv.ru/article/general/28-09-2017/chetyre-prichiny-po-kotorym-rezko-vyrosli-poteri-rossiyskoy-armii-v-sirii).
The Moscow paper reproduce the
argument of a Russian blogger whose screenname is Starley as picked up by the popular
Russian news aggregator site Newsland.ru (newsland.com/community/4109/content/pochemu-v-sirii-rezko-vozrosli-poteri-rossiiskikh-vks/6012771).
Reports about the death of a Russian
general and two colonels coming on top of additional reports about combat
losses among lower ranks has raised the question as to why there should be an
uptick in the number of dead and wounded if the war is going as well as the
Moscow media say, the blogger suggested.
He offers four explanations for
this:
·
First,
it is theoretically possible that “the Russian side has ceased to conceal true
losses in Syria. But in fact this is hardly possible,” given past practice and
the government’s control of the media.
·
Second,
the losses reflect a heightened level of participation by Russian forces in the
fight with the Islamists. That is
certainly the case given that the size of the Russian military contingent there
has reached its largest level ever and its members have been thrown into the
fight.
·
Third,
the United States has supplied more arms via third parties to those against
whom Russian forces are fighting. With better weapons, Russia’s opponents can
inflict more damage.
·
And
fourth, he says, there is “the main cause: The Kremlin has established definite
time frames for the conclusion of the war with the Islamists.” The war must be over before Putin’s
reelection next spring.
Given that time frame, the blogger
says, the Russian forces are fighting harder – and because they are and because
their opponents are better armed than in the past, they are suffering more
losses and among the higher ranks.
No comments:
Post a Comment