Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 28 – Sixty-five
percent of Russians now say that the media doesn’t cover the economic situation
in Russia fully, the highest figure ever, and many of them say that their main
fears are inflation, loss of savings and shortages of goods, according to
Mikhail Sergeyev, the chief economics correspondent for Nezavisimaya gazeta.
As a result, he says, one is fully
justified in concluding that as the Russian expression has it, “the
refrigerator is beginning to defeat the television,” with what people see in
their own lives being more important to their views than what they are told
they should think by state television (ng.ru/economics/2017-09-28/1_7083_holodilnic.html).
It is increasingly the case,
Sergeyev continues, that “the real picture of economic problems in the eyes of
the population looks completely different than the one presented in official
statistical reports,” something that he says is confirmed even by “pro-government”
survey organizations like VTsIOM.
Other experts agree. Mark Goykhman,
an analyst at TeleTrade, says that “people feel on the basis of their own
experience that the conditions of their lives do not correspond to the
victorious claims of the media.” As a result, the optimistic attitudes
television seeks to promote are fading.
And fading along with it, he continues,
is public trust in the mass media, which as things have gotten worse in real
life has become even more upbeat than before, thereby raising questions in the minds
of many who earlier were prepared to accept a certain disjunction between the
two.
Meanwhile, Andrey Novikov-Lanskoy,
an analyst at the Russian Academy of Economics and State Service, adds that “traditional
media, including television are gradually losing their influence on public
opinion. Everyone is turning to social media, to blogs and videoblogs. The
chief channels of communication … are quietly becoming the net media.”
In his view, such changes in public
attention reflect not only the gap between life and reporting but also “the
problem of the quality” of economic journalism, “which is conducted either by
journalists without special economic education or by economics who have not
mastered very well the habits of journalism.”
No comments:
Post a Comment