Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 10 – Russians use the
ethnonym “Russian” as if it were something ancient, Yaroslav Butakov says; “but
this is not the case: the word ‘Russian’ as a name entered into the language comparatively
recently; and “for a long time, our ancestors called themselves something else.”
“The ethnonym ‘Russian’ is initially
an adjectival form,” much as is the case with many Germanic peoples like the
English and Deutsch but far more rarely among other Slavic groups like the Poles,
the Czechs, the Croatians, the Ukrainians, and the Bulgarians, the Russian commentator
says (russian7.ru/post/kak-i-kogda-russkie-uznali-chto-oni-russ/).
For most of the
last millennium, “’Russian’ related only to the land populated by Rus or under
the power of Rus,” he says. Many of the
residents of the Russian land called themselves Rusins, while others like the Byzantines called them Rossy. Then when ancient Rus was split
between Muscovy and Lithuania, “the word Rusin
was used by the former.”
“As a rule,” Butakov continues, it
served for identification in the conflicts of a larger community” and acquired
a certain super-national meaning. But Muscovy and Lithuania “called [the residents
of] one another Muscovite and Lithuanian.” But even in the 18th
century, he says, “Russians as had been the case earlier did not know that they
were Russians.”
“Only since the middle of the 19th
century did official ethnography, obviously under the influence of the term ‘nationality’
from the ideological slogan-triade, introduce the word Russian to designation the
entire community of Orthodox subjects of the all-Russian empire who spoke
Slavic languages.”
The official ideology divided these
people into the Great Russians, the Little Russians and the White Russians,
Butakov says; but it is important to keep in mind that “the population itself
never called itself” using these terms. And
that points to an important conclusion: the neologism Russian was invented to consolidate the Orthodox of the
empire.
Up to World War I, there is a great
deal of evidence that “the mass of the people who are now called Russians did
not have any common national self-consciousness” and identified instead by
regions. Those who did use the term Russian as a self-designator extended it
exclusively to the Great Russians, even though no one used that term.
After the Bolshevik revolution, the
liquidation of illiteracy and the imposition of a passport regime “confirmed
the term Russian as a form of ethnic self-identification,” a shift that was finally
cemented in black by the Russian patriotism that Moscow promoted during World War
II.
No comments:
Post a Comment