Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 4 – Zakhar Prilepin,
a Russian writer, controversialist, and opposition figure, says that Moscow
must mobilize the three million Russians living in the United States in advance
of the 2018 Congressional elections to help ensure the election of pro-Moscow
candidates.
In a Svobodnaya pressa commentary, he says that Russian officials must recognize
that this community is fundamentally different than it was in Soviet times.
Then, it was largely anti-Moscow; but now, he argues, the situation has
fundamentally changed – and Russia must take advantage of it (svpressa.ru/world/article/180600/).
First of all,
Prilepin writes, “the majority of Russians who’ve moved to the US … vote for
Republics not for Democrats, and the Republicans as you will understand are
something like the KPRF fortified by the LDPR and with a sprinkling of ‘United
Russia.’” That means that “not only in Russia are ‘slaves’ dreaming of ‘a
strong hand’ and other ‘militarism’ but there too.”n he US
And second, “it is curious how
Russians who want to get an American passport but still haven’t received it
continue to vote in elections for the State Duma of the Russian Federation.” In 2011, the overwhelming majority of the Russians
who took part voted for the systemic parties in Russia – United Russia, KPRF
and LDPR. Only a third voted for Yabloko.
Before the 2016 presidential
elections in the US, he continues, 53.3 percent of the Russian-speaking
diaspora there expressed support for Donald Trump. The real figure was
undoubtedly higher but some of these people felt constrained from expressing a
view not comme il faut in many
American or Russian circles, Prilepin says.
In general, then, “if Russia would
like to work with various centers of power in the US and to the extent possible
oppose the pressure of hostile forces there,” the Russian writer says, “we have
a serious group of support.” It may not include
all three million but perhaps at least two – and “this is a lot.”
Moreover,
the real size of this pro-Moscow diaspora may be even larger, he suggests,
because many of the spouses of Russian women in the US in the course of time
become pro-Moscow in their thinking as well. If one adds them, Prilepin says,
the real size of this pro-Moscow bloc could be not two million but four.
It is thus time to think about how
to use them, especially in the upcoming Congressional elections. Where there
are a large number of Russian-speakers, Moscow should encourage them to support
pro-Moscow candidates in races for the House of Representatives. And that is “only one example” of what Russia
should be doing.
On the one hand, there is nothing
surprising about such musings: many people in varioius countries think about
making use of their diaspora populations in other countries as a major form of “soft”
power to influence outcomes. But on the other, in the current case, it is quite
remarkable indeed for three reasons.
First, Russians have long been
conditioned to view emigres as invariably hostile. Prilepin’s words suggest
that ever more people in Moscow are recognizing the reality that many of the
new Russians in the West are anything but and thus can be used to good effect.
Second, Russians also traditionally
looked to the Democratic and not the Republican Party in the US as their better
ally in promoting good relations between East and West. Now that has changed as
well, at least in the perception of those who think like Prilepin.
And third, his proposal comes even
as the US is investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential
elections. Prilepin’s words are a clear
indication that Moscow has no intention of backing off or of limiting such
participation. Instead, it appears to be planning to do even more in the future
– and to do so in far more races than in the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment